It became the problem by the remark of the Japanese politician, but were they really abducted?
Recruitment of charity dames advertisement at the time of World War II
According to this image, their then monthly income is approximately ¥900, 000 (About $9500)
But, they say that they get nothing
Remark of a taken person
1992 I got red dress and leather shoes from the man of an army cap and the Korean men's national uniform during World War II
Because I was glad, I followed it immediately
December, 2000 I was deceived by a Japanese
June 26, 2002 A bayonet was thrust I was taken at the age of 14 years old
December 4, 2004 I was taken to the man who wore the clothes such as the military uniform
August 3, 2005 I was threatened with a rifle by the man who wore the clothes such as the military uniform and was taken
February 22, 2007 A neck was caught by a Japanese soldier and was dragged out of a house at the age of 14 years old
March 2, 2007 a soldier and a woman entered the family at late-night 2:00 or 3:00
A sword was thrust, and the tongue was blocked up, and I was taken out from the home
I was made to take a train in a soldier who caught three women
March 6, 2007 The Japanese soldier blocked up my tongue and could not call mother and dragged it out of a house
This is quotation from an article announced formally
Their remark is considerably suspicious
Korea abandons all the rights of the request to Japan in a Japan-Korea treaty
In the case of a Japan-Korea treaty, Japan does compensation of 800 million dollars to Korea(When it is current value, it is approximately 6, 400 million dollars)
Japan added it and paid 670 billion yen under the pretense of money of economic cooperation of various form
Does everybody think that the compensation does not terminate in this either?
Then how about Korea?
The URL that he introduces in a video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0goL88N8pQE
The URL that he introduces in a video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oU7hJVeixCg
How do you think?